So, if “bundle” is a standard packaging option, as maven guys, would you say that: So when in doubt, use the extension in the repository as your dependency type and don’t worry about the actual pom packaging. But I have some “maven-related” ideas to clarify: In the POM http: They are fine for optimizing your builds but are not necessary if you are building a normal Java system 4 Read the maven books.
|Date Added:||13 August 2005|
|File Size:||63.27 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Here is a part of my POM: So when in doubt, use the extension log4j-1.2.16.jar the log4j-1.2.16.jar as your dependency type and don’t worry about the actual pom packaging. Too many people use custom plug-ins to hide bad practices.
Download log4j JAR ➔ With all dependencies!
Search everywhere only in this topic. On 26 November So I log4j-1.2.16.jar I will talk with the guys of m2eclipse now. This makes so many things much easier and adds a lot of transparency and visibility to your work with maven.
They are fine for optimizing your builds but are not necessary if you are building a normal Java log4j-1.2.16.jar 4 Read the maven books. I don’t criticize or something. But I have some “maven-related” ideas to clarify: Anyway, I have added it log4j-1.2.16.jar my POM, but maven fails at finding it on the repository.
Download : log4j « l « Jar File Download
However log4j-1.2.16.jar type of this artifact is log4j-1.2.16.jar because it is still a JAR file – it just uses a different lifecycle to check and generate the JAR, and this lifecycle also adds the appropriate OSGi metadata to the artifact. I have tried to change type as log4j-1.2.16.jqr as you proposed and it works, even without my workaround.
If the jar contain log4j-1.2.16.jar osgi manifest it’s a bundle. For now, I have found a workaround by deploying log4j in my local repository as a “jar” package: Isn’t the central repository a log4j-1.2.16.jar server of some kind that should have some consistency checks on “upload”? Free advice – worth at least what you are paying. Is it just a big jar with all dependencies included?
So, if “bundle” is a standard packaging option, as maven guys, would you say that: In reply to this post log4j-1.2.16.jar raphael. Hi, try to download with packaging type jar. Thanks in advance for your help, — Raphael Apache Maven 2.
Index of /groups/public/log4j/log4j/1.2.16
I will definitely log4j-1.2.16.jar the log4j team. In the POM http: Hello, In my project, I have a dependency over log4j 1. Lov4j-1.2.16.jar will drive you crazy, lo4gj-1.2.16.jar the hell out of log4j-1.2.16.jar rest of us, lead to countless frustrating questions and in the end it will be worse more fragile, more complex and less automated than your current system.
I mean, I expect the stuff found in the central repository to be reliable able to find all needed dependencies, and all indexed artifact.
log4j:log4j:bundle:1.2.16 : Bundle or JAR ?
I’m actually migrating all our projects to maven and I want to be sure of the durability of the solution I choose. I’m not sure what it really is: Definitely ask the Log4j team, we have no idea what they intended to do.
I am working with m2eclipse and I think that he is as confused as I was. The central repository or my maven client? So log4j-1.2.16.jar worry, Maven will do the job for you. If you do not like the Maven way, don’t start with Maven. So who is log4j-1.2.16.jar